Hi,
Thanks for asking your question on Just Answer. I know that getting differing opinions from two specialists is frustrating and confusing, but it is good that you are getting a third opinion. That is why we call medicine an "art" - there are variations based upon a doctor's experiences, the research and the types of animals with which we work.
The most current research (2006) is a study that is yet to be published called Vetproof. It studies the drug Enalapril and it's effect in dogs with mitral valve disease in delaying the onset of congestive heart failure.
The results of this study were:
Time to Onset of Heart Failure - The median time from study entry to heart failure was 893 days (~2.5 years).
Physical variables that determined a poorer outcome were heart rate >150 bpm and age >12 years. Murmur grade was NOT SIGNIFICANTLY correlated with worsening prognosis - gender had no demonstrable effect.
The strongest determinant of a poor outcome was radiographic evidence of severe left atrial enlargement.
Echocardiographic findings too were useful in prognostication of the outcome of these dogs, with left atrial and left ventricular size correlating to a poorer prognosis.
Somewhat surprisingly, a higher left ventricular shortening fraction predicted a hastening to heart failure.
There was no significant difference in survival between those dogs treated with enalapril or placebo with regard to the time to onset of congestive heart failure.
Bottom line, if your dog is asymptomatic, there is little indication to start on medication. The difference would be if your dog didn't have mitral valve disease, but had dilated cardiomyopathy. In that case, heart meds could make a difference.
I hope this helps. Please let me know if you need more information. Good luck!
__________________
I share your concerns and am glad you have sought out help. I strive to provide you with excellent service. If this information has been helpful to you, please Accept! Bonuses are ALWAYS APPRECIATED.
